Publications Archives: December, 2011

Predicting thesuccess of fragment screening by X-ray crystallography

December 31, 2011

Davies DR, Begley DW, Hartley RC, Staker BL, Stewart LJ.

Methods Enzymol. 2011;493:91-114.

Fragment screening using X-ray crystallography is a method that can provide direct three-dimensional readouts of the structures of protein-small molecule complexes for lead development and fragment-based drug discovery. With current technology, an amenable crystal form can be screened crystallographically against a library of 1000-2000 fragments in 1-2 weeks. We have performed over a dozen crystallographic screening campaigns using our own compound collection called Fragments of Life™ (FOL). While the majority of our fragment screening campaigns have generated multiple hits, some unexpectedly turned out to be nonproductive, either yielding no bound ligands, or only those thought to be inadequate for lead development. In this chapter, we have attempted to identify one or more parameters which could be used to predict whether a crystallized protein target would be a good candidate for fragment hit discovery. Here, we describe the parameters of crystals from 18 fragment screening campaigns, including six unsuccessful targets. From this analysis, we have concluded that there are no parameters that are absolutely predictive of fragment screening success. However, we do describe a parameter we have termed pocket factor which provides a statistically significant variance between nonproductive targets and productive targets shown to bind fragments. The pocket factor is calculated using a novel method of consensus scoring from three distinct pocket-finding algorithms, and the results may be used to prioritize targets for fragment screening campaigns based on an initial crystal structure.

Small molecule allosteric modulators of phosphodiesterase 4

December 31, 2011

Gurney, ME, Burgin, AB, Magnusson, OT, and Stewart, LE

Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. 2011;(204):167-92.

Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors have shown benefit in human clinical trials but dosing is limited by tolerability, particularly because of emesis. Novel cocrystal structures of PDE4 catalytic units with their regulatory domains together with bound inhibitors have revealed three different PDE4 conformers that can be exploited in the design of novel therapeutic agents. The first is an open conformer, which has been employed in the traditional approach to the design of competitive PDE4 inhibitors. The second is an asymmetric dimer in which a UCR2 regulatory helix from one monomer is placed in a closed conformation over the opposite active site in the PDE4 dimer (trans-capping). Only one active site can be closed by an inhibitor at a time with the consequence that compounds exploiting this conformer only partially inhibit PDE4 enzymatic activity while retaining potency in cellular and in vivo models. By placing an intrinsic ceiling on the magnitude of PDE4 inhibition, such compounds may better maintain spatial and temporal patterning of signaling in cAMP microdomains with consequent improved tolerability. The third is a symmetric PDE4 conformer in which helices from the C-terminal portion of the catalytic unit cap both active sites (cis-capping). We propose that dual-gating of PDE4 activity may be further fine tuned by accessory proteins that recognize open or closed conformers of PDE4 regulatory helices.

Small molecule allosteric modulators of phosphodiesterase 4

December 31, 2011

Gurney ME, Burgin AB, Magnusson OT, Stewart LJ.

Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011;(204):167-92. Review.

Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors have shown benefit in human clinical trials but dosing is limited by tolerability, particularly because of emesis. Novel cocrystal structures of PDE4 catalytic units with their regulatory domains together with bound inhibitors have revealed three different PDE4 conformers that can be exploited in the design of novel therapeutic agents. The first is an open conformer, which has been employed in the traditional approach to the design of competitive PDE4 inhibitors. The second is an asymmetric dimer in which a UCR2 regulatory helix from one monomer is placed in a closed conformation over the opposite active site in the PDE4 dimer (trans-capping). Only one active site can be closed by an inhibitor at a time with the consequence that compounds exploiting this conformer only partially inhibit PDE4 enzymatic activity while retaining potency in cellular and in vivo models. By placing an intrinsic ceiling on the magnitude of PDE4 inhibition, such compounds may better maintain spatial and temporal patterning of signaling in cAMP microdomains with consequent improved tolerability. The third is a symmetric PDE4 conformer in which helices from the C-terminal portion of the catalytic unit cap both active sites (cis-capping). We propose that dual-gating of PDE4 activity may be further fine tuned by accessory proteins that recognize open or closed conformers of PDE4 regulatory helices.